Tag: Judiciary

Free speech and its impact on policymaking

On By jsaideepakIn Articles in Mainstream MediaLeave a comment

The Daily Guardian

A democracy too places a premium on maximising good for the maximum number of people, but what makes it different is the premise that there is a lot more room for accommodation of diverse voices with every voice, in theory, being equal in the eyes of law notwithstanding its station in the society’s unwritten pecking order. The inherent participatory premise of democracy and the promise of egalitarianism, howsoever illusory, ephemeral and superficial, is what makes it seem so attractive…

Continue reading Free speech and its impact on policymaking

Fifty one shades of speech

On By jsaideepakIn Articles in Mainstream MediaLeave a comment

The Daily Guardian

Over the last few days, “hate speech” has become the talk of the town because some have taken offense to the contents of a certain programme which, they believe, target a particular community. While the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, and the Hon’ble Supreme Court, are simultaneously, and perhaps incongruously, seized of the case, it may be worthwhile to understand the relationship between speech, culture and public morality. In the interest of fair disclosure, this author is appearing on behalf of a few Intervenors in the proceedings before the Supreme Court.…

Continue reading Fifty one shades of speech

Etching the contours of public morality

On By jsaideepakIn Articles in Mainstream MediaLeave a comment

The Daily Guardian

The sum and substance of these discussions is that under the framework of the Indian Constitution, it is the State, meaning thereby the Executive and the Legislature but not the Judiciary, which has the power to invoke public morality within reasonable bounds for the purposes of placing reasonable restrictions on fundamental rights guaranteed by Part III…

Continue reading Etching the contours of public morality

Is Article 32 available against the judiciary?

On By jsaideepakIn Articles in Mainstream MediaLeave a comment

The Daily Guardian

In the previous piece, this author had demonstrated through application of principles of interpretation and with the aid of Constituent Assembly Debates (CAD) that the Judiciary does not fall within the meaning of “the State” for the purposes of Article 12. This effectively leads to the conclusion that the Judiciary does not have the Constitutional mandate to interfere with fundamental rights…

Continue reading Is Article 32 available against the judiciary?